Monday, May 18, 2026

A Tale of Two Novels

I recently finished two novels that I was surprised had some significant similarities but yet wildly different takes.  I thought it might be good to talk a little about the two, and in particular, to warn against one of them.

The two novels in question are M.R. Leonard’s Pilgrims and Douglas Preston and Aletheia Preston’s Paradox.  Both are the debut novels for an author (Leonard and Aletheia, the daughter of Douglas).  Both have connections with the question about life on other planets.  Both have connections to the Catholic Church.  Everything else, past this paragraph is major spoilers, because that is the only way to discuss them further.  So, if you’re interested in reading them, but don’t want to be spoiled, stop at this paragraph.  I will just say this summation: I have already recommended Pilgrims to others; I will never recommend Paradox to anyone.



In Pilgrims, humanity has been preparing for an alien invasion for 5 years, since the first sign of them approaching Earth.  The main character is a Latin teacher, Austin DeSantis, who loses his job and is desperate for money.  When the aliens arriving, hovering in ships over major cities, the world is shocked when they start speaking in Latin.  The government forces Austin to act as an interpreter, or face death for being an accomplice to murder.

The aliens, it turns out, are Catholic, hence the Latin.  Austin becomes a pawn of the US government, who want to use him to infiltrate the aliens, gain their friendship, then bring them down.  He, reluctantly, becomes friends with one of the aliens and a Catholic priest-astronomer who has also been chosen to visit the alien spaceship.

Why do the aliens speak Latin?  Why are they Catholic?  Thousands of years ago, through their intellect they came to know that there was a God, but they didn’t know Him until they visited Earth and witnessed Jesus’ Passion, death, Resurrection, and ascension.  When they share their “videos” with the world as proof, Muslims nuke the Vatican, killing the pope.  In retaliation, the aliens completely wipeout every non-Christian in Saudi Arabia.  In an attempt to stop the aliens, the priest agrees to celebrate Mass on the spaceship, allowing them to receive Jesus.

Lots more happens, but in the end, the world is saved, and Austin is on the path to conversion.  It’s a compelling story, and deeply Catholic.  My minor qualms come down to how the priest celebrates Mass on the spaceship.  I’m also not entirely convinced that it is a “sci-fi retelling of Augustine’s Confessions.”  It is much more of a “thinking” sci-fi, with not much action.  But for what it is, it is interesting, it keeps the reader engaged, and, as I said, I have already recommended it to others.  (An aside: a non-Catholic actually recommended it to me, which was interesting)

 

The other novel I just finished reading is Paradox, a sequel to Extinction, which I read last year.  Extinction was not quite the updated Jurassic Park that some reviewers claimed, but I still found it interesting and I wanted to see what happened next with the Neanderthals on the loose.

 


There’s a lot going on in Paradox, but the “Neanders” are nowhere to be found, except as an occasional reference to the previous book.  Essentially, an exobiologist breaks into a church in Rome, steals part of the skull of St. John the Baptist, and an Irish monk is sent to America to bring it back.  Meanwhile, an eccentric prospector and UFO conspiracy theorist is found murdered in his cabin in Colorado (which brings in the main characters, Cash and Colcord, from Extinction).

Where do I begin with how this novel upset me?  First, there is the “trans” reporter who is referred to as “they/them,” making it almost impossible to follow scenes with her because of the stupid plural referring to singular.  So, it’s woke.  Second, there is the problem with the Catholic Church.  The murderers use Inquisition torture methods, because of course the Inquisition is evil.  They also kill two of the characters who are Catholic by stuffing them with the Eucharist, you know, as Viaticum (oh, and by the way, at the end of the book a female character performs the “Last Rites,” because the authors didn’t bother to actually research anything).  Then there is the small-town priest who is portrayed as evil because he prefers the Latin Mass and says that people misunderstand the Inquisition.  Never mind that, in the end, he helps save Cash and Colcord, he still is seen as a crazy person not to be trusted.

Then there is the realization at the end of the novel that “upends everything people think they know about religion.”  You see, Jesus and his apostles (which apparently include John the Baptist?) were all aliens.  So, he wasn’t really God, just an alien with super powers.  I’m all for science fiction and interesting stories, but I draw the line at blasphemy.  In an Afterword, the authors try to explain it all as a fun little theory that some people have, but they also scoff at such theories being a threat to the Church.  It’s all a fiction account, after all, no harm done.  I’m glad it makes it easy for me to say I will never read another book from Douglas Preston again.

Saturday, March 28, 2026

2026 MLB Preview

I’m a little late getting to this thanks to a very busy schedule.  Here’s some quick predictions:

American League

East


Toronto Blue Jays

            Last year’s AL winner lost Bichette but make some other moves to improve a bit.  The class of a very good division.

Baltimore Orioles

            Last year was a disappointment, until you realize that after the worst possible start they actually had a very good second half.  Still love the young offense, and they are working to improve the pitching.

Boston Red Sox

            Not as high on them as some people are (a few have picked them to win it all), but their starting rotation is formidable.

New York Yankees

            Yes, they won the division last year, but that was thanks to huge seasons by Judge and Chisholm.  They stood pat while the other teams above them tried to improve.

Tampa Bay Rays

            Another off season of dumping almost everyone on their roster.

 

Central

 


Detroit Tigers

            Like almost everyone else, I believe in Hinch and this team.  They are actually going for it in what is probably Skubal’s last season with the team.

Kansas City Royals

            A very good core of young hitters and a solid rotation.

Cleveland Indians

            Where is there any offense outside Jose Ramirez?  Yes, the pitching is great, but you still need to score runs to win.

Chicago White Sox

            Most are picking them to finish last again, but I think they made a couple of good moves and will be slightly better than the team that just doesn’t care about winning.

Minnesota Twins

            Not believing in this team again.  The ownership doesn’t care.  Buxton is a lock to be gone before the end of the season.

 

West

 


Seattle Mariners

            Now the class of the division until proven differently.

Sacramento? Athletics

            They have a really good young offense.  I love Jacob Wilson and Kurtz and the others.  Until they get into a real stadium, however, the question will always be the pitching.

Houston Astros

            They surprised me greatly last year, just missing the playoffs despite the most injured times in MLB history.  The problem remains the same, do they have enough offense?  Will Yordan finally have a healthy season?

Texas Rangers

            Some people have bought into their rotation, but there’s too much injury risk to think they can do it again.

Los Angeles Angels

            They still haven’t had a 100 loss season.  Is it this year?

 

National League

East


Philadelphia Phillies

            This division is not as good as many people think.  I have too many questions about the other teams that I have the Phillies winning by default.


Atlanta Braves

Injuries, injuries, injuries.

New York Mets

            I love the addition of Bichette, but this is still the Mets.

Miami Marlins

            Some good pieces, but not enough to compete.

Washington Nationals

            Speaking of competing, they will compete for worst record in baseball.

 

Central

 


Milwaukee Brewers

            They lost Peralta, but until they lose, I’m going to pick them.


Chicago Cubs

            Throwing a good amount of money around, but I still don’t think they are a complete team.  Bregman will help as a leader, however.

Pittsburgh Pirates

            Last year they disappointed (at least me).  This year, I like that they finally tried to improve their offense.  The biggest problem will be defense, with many guys out of position.

Cincinnati Reds

            I’m not a believer, especially with Hunter Greene out.

St. Louis Cardinals

            Nope.

 

West


Los Angeles Dodgers

            Booooooooo (copied from last year)


San Diego Padres

            Year-by-year a frustrating team.

Arizona Diamondbacks

            They have just enough to possibly finish second, or fourth.

San Francisco Giants

            The definition of “mid”.

Colorado Rockies

            Will they ever be competitive again?

 


Playoffs: 

AL:

            Blue Jays

            Tigers

            Mariners

            Orioles

            Royals

            Red Sox

NL:

            Phillies

            Brewers

            Dodgers

            Cubs

            Pirates

            Braves

 

World Series: Blue Jays over Dodgers


            Righting the wrong of last year.

 

(trying to pick some fun winners rather than boring)

AL MVP: Bobby Witt Jr. (I’m going to pick him until he wins one)

AL Cy Young: Hunter Brown


AL ROY: Kevin McGonigle


 

NL MVP: Fernando Tatis Jr.


NL Cy Young: Jacob Misiorowski


NL ROY: Bubba Chandler

Monday, February 16, 2026

Movies by Decade: Best of the Best

I originally was going to have a “Best of the 2020s” list, but it has been such a terrible decade of movies so far that I can’t justify even a Top 10.  Yes, there’s still 4 years to go, but I don’t have much hope for it to get better.  So instead, this is my comprehensive list, combining the decade lists that I had made, adding a couple of movies from the 2020s and one from the 1920s, and seeing how they all stack up.  I can’t say this is a perfect list, and even while making it there were a few times I wanted to make some changes within the decades, but I stuck to the lists as they were and went by that.  That’s also, perhaps, why you might see a run on movies from a certain decade.  I tacked on a few from the current decade at the end just to make it an even 100.

So, without added comments, my list of the Best of the Best, in order:

 

1.               Ben-Hur (1959)

2.               Lawrence of Arabia (1962)

3.               The Searchers (1956)

4.               Casablanca (1942)

5.               It’s A Wonderful Life (1946)

6.               Schindler’s List (1993)

7.               The Shawshank Redemption (1994)

8.               King Kong (1933)

9.               Rocky (1976)

10.           Jaws (1975)

11.           Star Wars (1977)

12.           Superman (1978)

13.           Apollo 13 (1995)

14.           Jurassic Park (1993)

15.           Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991)

16.           Saving Private Ryan (1998)

17.           The Passion of the Christ (2004)

18.           Alien (1979)

19.           Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (2003)

20.           Sense and Sensibility (1995)

21.           My Fair Lady (1964)

22.           Going My Way (1944)/The Bells of St. Mary’s (1945)

23.           Black Hawk Down (2001)

24.           Rear Window (1954)

25.           Roman Holiday (1954)

26.           Spartacus (1960)

27.           E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982)

28.           The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001)

29.           Bringing Up Baby (1938)

30.           The Mission (1986)

31.           Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (1939)

32.           Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937)

33.           Back to the Future (1985)

34.           Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)

35.           Star Wars: Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back (1980)

36.           The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938)

37.           North by Northwest (1959)

38.           The Philadelphia Story (1940)

39.           The Silence of the Lambs (1991)

40.           The Wizard of Oz (1939)

41.           1917 (2019)

42.           The Field of Dreams (1989)

43.           The Best Years of Our Lives (1946)

44.           The Fugitive (1993)

45.           West Side Story (1961)

46.           The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance (1962)

47.           Fort Apache (1948)/She Wore a Yellow Ribbon (1949)

48.           The Quiet Man (1952)

49.           Sergeant York (1941)

50.           The Song of Bernadette (1943)

51.           Die Hard (1988)

52.           The Hunt for Red October (1990)

53.           The Great Escape (1963)

54.           The Sound of Music (1965)

55.           Toy Story 3 (2010)

56.           White Christmas (1954)

57.           The Thin Man (1934)

58.           Planet of the Apes (1968)

59.           Road to Perdition (2002)

60.           It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World (1963)

61.           Gladiator (2000)

62.           To Catch a Thief (1955)

63.           A Day at the Races (1937)

64.           Stagecoach (1939)

65.           Red River (1948)

66.           Road to Morocco (1942)

67.           Alexander Nevsky (1938)

68.           Thirteen Lives (2022)

69.           The Natural (1984)

70.           Planes, Trains, and Automobiles (1987)

71.           12 Angry Men (1957)

72.           Patton (1970)

73.           Fiddler on the Roof (1971)

74.           Of Gods and Men (2010)

75.           La Passion de Jeanne d’Arc (1929)

76.           The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh (1977)

77.           The Bridge on the River Kwai (1957)

78.           The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (1966)

79.           The Count of Monte Cristo (2002)

80.           Finding Neverland (2004)

81.           13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi (2016)

82.           Wind River (2017)

83.           Ford v. Ferrari (2019)

84.           Devotion (2022)

85.           Unbreakable (2000)

86.           True Grit (2010)

87.           The King’s Speech (2010)

88.           Ferris Bueller’s Day Off (1986)

89.           Paddington (2014)

90.           A Quiet Place (2018)

91.           Sound of Freedom (2023)

92.           Godzilla Minus One (2023)

93.           Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977)

94.           Ocean’s Eleven (2001)

95.           Cabrini (2024)

96.           The Thirty Nine Steps (1978)

97.           A Quiet Place Part II (2020)

98.           Fatima (2020)

99.           Dune: Part One (2021)

100.       F1 (2025)

 

Monday, December 29, 2025

52 in 25: #52 - Finishing the Year

To finish off the year, I have two books I’m basically finished with, or at least will be by the end of the year.

The first is something that has been part of my daily holy hour for the year: A Year with the Mystics, compiled by Kathyrn Jean Lopez.  This is basically 365 days worth of reflections from various saints with a prompt for further consideration and a closing prayer.  On the one hand, there are some really good reflections in here.  On the other hand, it was frustrating at points because, by the author’s words, this was not necessarily meant to be read starting on January 1, so it’s kind of random where reflections fell.  It really took me out of it when, for instance, there was something about Christmas in the middle of Lent.  Very mixed bag for me.


 


The other is The Life of St. Francis of Assisi by Saint Bonaventure.  This the TAN Classics reprint of a translation from 1867.  Certainly, this is a classic.  I do have some struggles with it.  The first is that it is not a chronological biography, but rather a thematic reflection on his life.  The second is (and this is somewhat common for some saint biographies) he is presented as so perfect that it can become frustratingly impossible to relate with him.  This is a similar reason why I stopped reading the classic biography of St. John Vianney.  Another difficult is just the language.  I’m not sure if this is due to the original by Bonaventure, or the translation from the 19th century.  These are long (long) paragraphs with sentences composed in ways that would never be done today.  Sometimes it makes it difficult to follow.  Again, I don’t know if that’s an artifact from the original or a (now) old translation.  That being said, it does not get more classic than this.


 

So, there you have it.  At least 52 books in 2025.  Would I do this again?  Probably not.  It did push me to read more, which was the objective.  It also encouraged me to read more classics that I have been wanting to get to.  That being said, it also discouraged me from reading certain books because I knew that I could not finish them in a timely manner.  My year experiment is done, but I may revisit this.  Perhaps a monthly update and some things I have read?

Wednesday, December 24, 2025

52 in 25: #51 - Love Does Such Things

There is a tradition in Advent to prepare for Christmas started by my parents years ago, and now I continue it on.  Every year, I read this beautiful little book called Love Does Such Things by Reverand Mary Raymond, O.C.S.O, published in Milwaukee in 1955.  It is a real treasure, and a book I highly recommend picking up if you can find it.


 


Fr. Raymond walks through the Christmas story, from the Annunciation through the return to Nazareth after Egypt.  Each chapter represents a different letter, to spell out the ultimate word of Christmas: “SAVIOUR.”  So the chapters are: Shepherds and Sheep, Angels, a Virgin, Nativity and Name (J=I), Offerings, Urgency, and Return and Retirement.  In the end, he sums it all up that God does all of this for you, for whom Love Does Such Things.


 

I love this book.  Each time I read it, something else jumps out at me.  I can’t tell you how many times little tidbits have made their way into my homilies during the Christmas season.  It also has beautiful paintings recreated in it.  I think it would be awesome if someone like TAN reprinted it to make it more available, because right now the only way to get it is to find it second hand (apparently there was a recent reprint, but it also is not available and it looks like it’s missing the original images).  Again, if you can, get a copy and enjoy it for years.


Friday, December 19, 2025

52 in 25: #50 - 58 Minutes

I followed up the book that “inspired” Die Hard with its sequel.  No, not the books’ sequel, but the novel that “inspired” Die Hard 2.  This was 58 Minutes by Walter Wager.

This is a very, very loose interpretation of “inspired” (or as the cover says: “basis”).  About the only thing that this novel and the movie have in common is that terrorists takeover an airport.  In this, case, it is JFK Airport in New York, along with the others in the area.  They demand the release of seven political prisoners.  On the case is airport officials, the FAA, and the NYPD chief terrorist captain, Frank Malone, who just happens to be there because his daughter is flying in.  The plane she is on will run out of fuel in 58 minutes, hence the title.


It's fine, as these thrillers go.  It’s not necessarily a “page turner” but it’s not boring.  There are quite a few conveniences to make the plot happen.  One of my biggest pet peeves is that, at the end of the story, Malone is convinced that there was an inside person who helped it all happen, he and the others say they need to figure out who it is, and then they all live happily ever after.  Did the author not know who it was?  You can’t just leave that important piece dangling.  Maybe the author was an early influence on J.J. Abrams?