Sunday, March 3, 2019

American League Uniforms


Ah, Spring Training.  Baseball is back in the air.  With plenty of snow here on the ground, it just increases my Spring itch.  I have to write about baseball, because I certainly am thinking about it a lot.  This Spring, I wanted to talk about the uniforms.  I have always liked the uniforms, and I have strong opinions about them.  My plan is to give a grade for each team’s current uniforms, and then talk about my favorite/least favorite uniforms for each franchise (note: for the older franchises many of the early years had no logos, which I will not factor into the best/worst).  Let’s jump into the American League.

Baltimore:




Grade: B+

Their white home jerseys are pretty good, but by far my favorite are the orange alternate jerseys with the white-front cap (I usually like caps that are three toned).  I am not a fan of their black jerseys nor of their “O’s” caps.  As usual, the road grays are average.

Best: 1989-1992



Before they were in Baltimore, they were the St. Louis Browns.  Their uniforms were largely as plain as they get.  Once they moved to Baltimore, the uniforms have been largely…uniform.  The biggest difference usually comes down to caps: smiling bird face or full bird.  I prefer the late 80s/early 90s version with orange alternate. 

Worst:  1995-1996



Again, it usually comes down to the caps, and for some reason these two seasons they had gray road caps.  Way too much gray.

Boston:




Grade: B+

While their uniforms are pretty classic, they are, let’s be honest, somewhat boring.  The alternate uniforms are decent, I think I prefer the blue over the red.  The caps are simple but always good.  I am glad they have gone back to wearing red socks.

Best:  1908



The first year they became the “Red Sox,” they went all out and had them on the jerseys.  For some reason, they only kept these beauties for one year.  They were previously the Boston Americans, hence the “B A” alternates, which are equally great.

Worst: 1973



These aren’t particularly bad, but since their uniforms have been pretty much the same since the 30s, I had to pick out something.  In this case, I am not a big fan of the pullover look versus the regular button downs.

New York:




Grade: A-

Similar to the Red Sox, they are classic and somewhat boring.  The edge is their pinstripes and the NY is nice.  I always appreciate that they have no alternates.

It’s not worth it to do a Best/Worst because it has basically been they have basically been the same throughout franchise history.

Tampa:





Grade: C-

The Rays uniforms are kind of plain and uninspired.  Their primary cap is fine, the alternate is dumb.  The dark blue uniform is definitely their best, the light blue is pretty bad.

Best: 2005-2007



The only Rays uniforms I think are halfway decent, I like these because of the green sleeves.  Even then, I’d only give them a barely passing grade.

Worst: 1998-2000



The original “Devil Rays” uniforms have the late-90s comical look that did not work.  They had way too many “unique” colors to make them stand out, and they were bad.

Toronto:



Grade: B+

Something about their uniforms works.  I love the jay logo with the red maple leaf.  Interestingly their blue “alternate” uniform, their best, was also worn the most last year.  I like how the numbers are not just solid.

Best:  1989-1990



A lot of teams went with the light blue road uniforms in the 70s and 80s, and I was a big fan.  This was definitely the best look for them.

Worst:  2004-2005



Yeah, I did not like the “new” look with the “Jays” across the front, and I did not understand why they did away with the classic logo.  They were smart to go back to the older look starting in 2012.  Especially bad are the gray home caps during these two years.

Chicago:




Grade: C

These uniforms are kind of boring.  Similar to Toronto, their black “alternates” were used the most last year.  In fact, they only wore the home pinstripes (my favorite) 27 games and the road grays 23 games.  It’s like they are trying to copy the Yankees, but they don’t have the historical gravitas.

Best: 1912-1915



For about two decades starting in 1912 their uniforms were variations on a theme, but these are my favorite.  I really like the “Sox” logo with the pinstripes for home, and the unusual (for the time) road dark blues.  Oh, and they actually wore white socks!

Worst: 1976-1981



These are the infamous softball jerseys for the White Sox, truly some of the worst for any franchise in baseball history.  Collars?  Boring blue and white?  Shorts (at least once)?  What were they thinking?

Cleveland:




Grade: C-

Usually red, white, and blue, are my favorite combos, but these uniforms are just boring.  We’re seeing a trend here, they wore their alternate blues the most.  I also usually like alternate blues, but again for some reason these just don’t work for me.  I guess I’m just not a fan of the script “Indians.”  This year, they are getting rid of Chief Wahoo on the caps, which is a shame (I know, racist, but it is much more interesting than the “C”).

Best:  1989-1993



I could say I like these most because I like the multicolor shoulders.  I could, but really I like these mostly because of the movie Major League (actually the second one, but I do prefer the striped shoulders over the plain ones from the first movie and 1986-1988).

Worst: 1974-1977



The Indians added red uniforms which definitely looked more pink.  They were incredibly ugly.  Especially terrible are the all “red” alternates they sometimes wore.

Detroit:




Grade: A

Classic, clean, really nice.  Even the road grays with the script “Detroit” work.  I also really like the Old English “D.”  These uniforms are so good they don’t need alternates.

Best:  1995-1997



The only real difference between these and the present uniforms?  The road cap had the tiger figure in the “D” and an orange brim.  I like this little difference just slightly better.

Worst:  1927



The vast majority of their uniforms have been similar, and similarly great.  This single season they went with cartoon tigers on their jerseys.  Those tigers were…less than great.  Good for them they ended the experiment after one season.

Kansas City:




Grade: C+

I don’t dislike these uniforms, they are just slightly above average.  I do like their “KC,” but not a huge fan of either of the alternate blue uniforms.

Best:  1973-1982



With the Red Sox, I said I prefer button-downs to pullovers.  Here, I am saying the opposite.  Maybe it is because these are from their best years, but the simple script on the home whites and the light blue road jerseys work best for me.

Worst:  1983-1991



Again, it seems like I am contradicting myself, since these years they went with the button-down jerseys.  What I really don’t like about them is the white script “Royals” on the road light blues.  It just does not work for me.  But to be honest, most of the uniforms in franchise history are about the same.

Minnesota:




Grade: C

Their set of uniforms are fine.  My favorite jersey would be the alternate pinstripe whites with the different script “Twins.”  I do not like the red alternate jerseys.  I am a fan of the caps with the “TC” logo.

Best:  1961-1971



Before they were in Minnesota, they were the Washington Senators/Nationals.  The Washington uniforms were all fairly bland, but not terrible.  Most of the uniforms since they’ve been in Minnesota have been fine, if I were grading them all they’d mostly be in the “C”s.  I basically just decided to go with the originals with the more simple “Twins” script.

Worst: 1987-2009



Two things I don’t like about these.  First, while I usually like pinstripes, I did not like the road grays with pinstripes.  Second: I hated the “M” caps.

Houston:



Grade: A-

Yes, I am a little biased, but I also really like the orange/blue combos.  I love that they returned to the H-star caps, especially with the orange brim.  Regarding the jerseys, I am still not totally solid on the alternate blues, though I do like how the sides call back to the rainbow unis.  The orange jerseys really stand out, but I also really like the classic, clean look of the home whites.  I usually prefer pinstripes, but in this case I’m glad they are not.

Best: 1965-1970


Everybody loves the Colt .45s jersey, but for the Astros the original shooting star is still my favorite.  I like most uniforms for the franchise, but this stands out for simplicity yet uniqueness.  The following four years the uniforms was similar except orange instead of blue, but I definitely like the blue better.

Worst: 2000-2012


I get why they went to the brick red uniforms after moving to then-Enron Field, but it was a complete disconnect from the rest of the franchise uniforms.  Since they don’t look like the Astros should look, they are my least favorite.  I was very happy when they went “retro” in 2013.

Los Angeles:



Grade: D

Like some other teams, they use their alternates the most.  Unfortunately, the alternate reds are easily their worst, and some of the worst in baseball.  It’s just way too much red.  Red on red on red.  The regular home whites are fine, as are the road grays, but those reds are just so bad.  It might be better if they had a blue cap that went with them, but no, the caps are also red on red.  Not good.

Best: 1973-1992


The uniform they have worn the longest was also their best.  There are just enough unique things about it, the halo around the “A”, the California on the sleeve, to keep it from being too boring.  I prefer it to the current set because of the use of blue rather than an overload of red.

Worst: 1997-2001



While the current uniforms are not great, the late 90s unis with the cartoonish angel wings were worse.  Some of the reworks in that era worked, this one definitely didn’t.

Oakland:



Grade: A

I love the A’s green and yellow.  Their alternate greens are the best, and of course they are worn the most.  Pretty much all of their jerseys are top notch, except the alternate yellow.  I prefer the home caps with the yellow brims, but the road all-greens are not bad.  There is really little to downgrade them, other than the yellow jerseys.

Best: 1987-Present


I love the Philadelphia uniforms, which were usually either with a large “A” or an elephant on the jersey.  When they were in Kansas City, in 1963, they switched from blue/red to green/yellow which they use now.  The uniform has been largely consistent since 1987, with slight variations.  I have already said why I like these so much.

Worst: 1968



The greens during this era were too yellow; I much prefer the darker green used now.  There is also the problem with the all-yellow unis they used.  Finally, I think this is the only year they went with “Oakland” across the chest, which is a bad departure from the historical “A’s”.

Seattle:



Grade: C-

I’ve never really bought into these uniforms, though they have been using them for a long time now.  Maybe my grade is a little harsh, but I just do not particularly like them.  I guess the regular home whites are okay, but nothing special.  The blues are probably their best, but the teals are hideous.

Best: 1981-1984



I definitely prefer the “pitchforks” (as my brothers called them) from the early years, plus the light blue road uniforms.  Maybe it’s a bit too much with the stripes down the sides, but I kind of like it.

Worst: 1993-Present


Yes, they have basically worn the same uniforms for over 25 years, or most of the Griffey years and since.  I already mentioned why I do not like them much.

Texas:



Grade: B-

The Rangers’ uniforms are kind of all over the place.  They almost have too many choices.  My favorite are the home whites, though the alternate blues are not bad.  I am not a huge fan of the alternate reds.  It seems like they should have better uniforms.  At least they have the Texas flag patches on the arms.

Best: 1976-1982



It’s a hard choice because I definitely liked the Ryan-era jerseys, but I like these for a couple of reasons.  First, I like the “Old West” look of the lettering.  Second, once again light blue road jerseys are winners.  Third, those road jerseys were definitely better than the boring road grays from the Ryan-era.

Worst: 1983



I don’t really remember seeing these before researching this post.  The jerseys are just too busy.  The logo may be okay as a logo, but not on the jersey.  Smart that they changed after one year.

Sunday, January 20, 2019

2019 Hall of Fame Ballot


The results of the 2019 Hall of Fame ballot will be released on Tuesday, so I have to give my thoughts ahead of time.  I will start with my ballot and then follow that with whom I think will get the votes.  I would love to vote for Roy Oswalt, but there's just no room.

My ballot:

Lance Berkman

            I realize he is a bit of a homer pick, since he was my favorite Astros player between Caminiti and Springer, but he does have some really good numbers.  I hope he gets somewhere in the 10-15% range to keep him on the ballot.

Todd Helton

            People discount his numbers too much due to playing his entire career in Colorado.  Regardless, he was one of the best, most consistent, first basemen during the steroids era who never had any suspicion about him.

Jeff Kent

            One of the best offensive second basemen of all time, I am surprised he only got 14.5% of the vote last year.

Edgar Martinez

            The greatest designated hitter of all time, he was, plain and simple, a great hitter.

Fred McGriff

            I have written about this before, but I cannot believe people say he does not belong in the Hall because he was seven home runs shy of 500 for his career (which he would have had if not for the strike in 1994).  He was never the flashiest player, but he was a solid offensive force for 15 years.  Unfortunately, because baseball writers are dumb, there is no way he jumps 50% on his final ballot.

Mike Mussina

            Upon further examination, I do think he deserves to be in the Hall.  His numbers are especially good when considering he pitched his entire career in the American League East.  His career totals are essentially the exact same as Jim Palmer and Juan Marichal.

Mariano Rivera

            I hated him, and I think he was overrated, but I cannot deny he belongs in the Hall.

Curt Schilling

            Once again, the only reason why he is not in the Hall is because people do not like his politics.  That’s ridiculous and a shame.  Beyond his postseason heroics, he was one of the best starters for almost 10 years.

Billy Wagner

            I really do not understand why he has received such a small amount of support (11.1%).  He was just a tick below Hoffman and Rivera.

Larry Walker

            Similar to Helton, people discount his numbers way too much with the “Coors effect.”  He was one of the best 5-tool players of his generation.

Who I think will get in:

Roy Halladay

            I don’t see it, but he is getting a lot of support (I hope not because of his untimely death).  He was good, but not for long enough.

Edgar Martinez

            It’s his last year on the ballot, and he was only a few votes shy.

Mike Mussina

            He’s been rising basically 10% each year since he started on the ballot in the mid-20s.  He was at 63.5% last year, I think he gets enough to squeak in, but barely.

Mariano Rivera

            He will be close to 100%

Monday, October 1, 2018

2018 Season Review and Playoff Review


Now that the regular season has ended and playoffs starting tomorrow, it’s time for a quick look back at my predictions for this year, how I did, and some predictions for the playoffs.  I’ll list it as the actual standings and my prediction in brackets.

American League
East


Boston Red Sox (2)
New York Yankees (1)
Tampa Bay Rays (5)
Toronto Blue Jays (3)
Baltimore Orioles (4)

Although I was way off with the Rays, like most “experts,” overall this isn’t bad.  I did have both the Sox and Yankees in the playoffs, I just got their positions swapped.

Central


Cleveland Indians (1)
Minnesota Twins (2)
Detroit Tigers (5)
Chicago White Sox (4)
Kansas City Royals (3)

Again not bad, though I did have the Twins in the Wild Card.  What a dreadful division, with only the Indians above .500.

West


Houston Astros (1)
Oakland Athletics (5)
Seattle Mariners (3)
Los Angeles Angels (2)
Texas Rangers (4)

Boy was I wrong about the A’s, though I don’t think many had them competing for the division to the end and ending up in the Wild Card.

National League
East


Atlanta Braves (4)
Washington Nationals (1)
Philadelphia Phillies (2)
New York Mets (3)
Miami Marlins (5)

Ouch, I did not see the Braves getting that good that fast.  This was kind of like the Astros in 2015.  It’s especially bad since I called this “the easiest division to pick.”  One of these years I will learn not to expect anything from the Nationals

Central


Milwaukee Brewers (1)
Chicago Cubs (2)
St. Louis Cardinals (3)
Pittsburgh Pirates (5)
Cincinnati Reds (4)

Well, how about that, it took an extra game but my upset was accurate.  I’m pretty proud of my homerism here.

West


Los Angeles Dodgers (1)
Colorado Rockies (3)
Arizona Diamondbacks (2)
San Francisco Giants (4)
San Diego Padres (5)

If the Diamondbacks hadn’t choked down the stretch, I could have been even more accurate here.  Still, not bad.

Overall: 7 of 12 playoff teams ain’t bad

Awards: Let’s not discuss this, though I do feel pretty good about my call of Ronald Acuna as NL ROY.

Now for my predictions:

Playoffs: (Original prediction was repeat of last year: Astros over Dodgers)

AL Wild Card: Athletics over Yankees (there’s something scrappy about this team)
NL Wild Card: Rockies over Cubs (Rocktober is hot, despite their showing in game 163)

ALDS: Astros over Indians in 4 (getting hot at the right time)
            Red Sox over Athletics in 5 (too much hitting but it’s close)

NLDS: Brewers over Rockies in 4 (bullpen + Yelich)
            Braves over Dodgers in 4 (Atlanta is a fun young team to watch)

ALCS: Astros over Red Sox in 5 (looking better at this time of the year)
            Brewers over Braves in 7 (Cain’s experience helps push them over the top)

World Series: Astros over Brewers in 4 (sorry but no NL team can hang with the top AL teams this year)

So yes, my World Series pick is a bit of a best case scenario for me, but it’s not implausible (at risk of a massive jinx).  Gotta love October!

Monday, July 30, 2018

Tom Cruise: Action Star and the Best of Mission: Impossible


It’s been awhile since I’ve had the time to write anything.  Between the end of the Spring semester, traveling in May, and hospital chaplaincy in the summer, I’ve been extremely busy.  I now have a few days where I can catch up on some things, and I wanted to actually sit down a write a little something.  Here goes.
As much as I don’t like him as a person, it pains me to admit that Tom Cruise is the best action star going.  He literally throws himself into parts, and is about the only star now who will do every stunt.  In fact, it’s become a major part of the Mission: Impossible franchise: seeing how much they can push him to do crazy stunts.  And that’s the real reason why I’m writing this today, because Mission: Impossible is the best action franchise now, and it just added another great entry.  Here’s my ranking of the franchise movies:

1.      Rogue Nation

This one is the most complete movie.  It’s action packed and it has an intriguing story.  It also introduces probably the best character of the franchise, Rebecca Ferguson’s Isla Faust.

2.      Ghost Protocol

In some ways this is a retread of the first movie, but it sets the template for the following movies.  It has the huge stunt piece that’s so crazy it’s hard to believe it’s real.  The only knock is that it peaks a little early and the third act is a bit of a letdown.

3.      Fallout

This was an excellent movie, and like the best of them it had me at the edge of my seat.  The action pieces are amazing, particularly the chase through Paris and the brutal fight in the bathroom.  There are two problems with it.  1: it’s predictable (I don’t want to spoil anything but I knew exactly what was going to happen throughout the movie).  2: I could not suspend my disbelief at one point in particular (SPOILER: there is no way a hook and rope can hold up a helicopter.  That really took away from the ending to me.  Also, the shot of the hook was the biggest foreshadowing for a villain being killed by a hook since Cobra).

4.      Mission: Impossible

I still think it’s funny that when this came out people said it was too complicated to follow.  It’s a really good movie, and still has one of the most iconic stunts in movies (people still reference Cruise hanging from the ceiling).  It’s not really an action movie, though, certainly not compared to the others.  It’s more of a spy movie, which isn’t bad.

5.      Mission: Impossible III

This is the one that really re-started the series.  The biggest problem is the whole story is based around one of the biggest MacGuffins in history.  That and almost all of the new crew are one-and-done.

6.      Mission: Impossible 2

Easily the worst of the bunch, it’s the only one that is less than good and it’s terrible.  It’s so bad I haven’t seen it again since seeing it in the theaters, outside of a few scenes here and there. 

Aside from just the movies, there are two things that really stand out in this franchise for me: stunts and music.  So, here’s my ranking of the scores:

1.      Rogue Nation (Joe Kraemer) – what a surprising delight since I didn’t really know Kraemer before this
2.      Mission: Impossible (Danny Elfman) – not your typical Elfman, he weaves in the classic theme well but also has his own interesting twist on spy music
3.      Mission: Impossible III (Michael Giacchino) – Giacchino is the best at using other people’s themes and expanding on them into his own thing
4.      Ghost Protocol (Michael Giacchino) – more of the same, which is not bad
5.      Mission: Impossible II (Hans Zimmer) – the least Mission: Impossible of the scores, it’s largely rote Zimmer late 90s action
6.      Fallout (Lorne Balfe) – maybe because it’s the newest, I can’t get into it as a stand alone.  It works fine in the movie, but is unoriginal

Best stunts:
1.      Hanging from the Burj Khalifa in Dubai (Ghost Protocol)

A lot of the “best” are recorded so due to my fear of highest, but Cruise was insane to do this.
2.      Hanging from a plane (Rogue Nation)

See above
3.      Halo jump (Fallout)

While it’s not as cool looking as the one in Godzilla, it’s definitely more crazy
4.      Helicopter chase (Fallout)

Of course Cruise learned how to fly just for this scene
5.      Hanging from ceiling (Mission: Impossible)

Not the most dangerous of stunts, but the most iconic
6.      Paris chase (Fallout)

1.      Morocco chase (Rogue Nation)


2.      Factory Rescue (III)

3.      Bridge attack (III)


And finally, just to show that Cruise is more than only Mission: Impossible, here are some of his other recent action movies that deserve mention:

Edge of Tomorrow
Oblivion
Jack Reacher
Collateral
The Last Samurai
Minority Report

Again, I don’t like him personally, but he makes some good action movies.